Keyword summary
41% 1 analyzed article/video 791 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Conflagration results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 213 hits . Analysis detected 1,580 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 43% (31,796 of 55,683 keywords). This Urban Conflagration is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Urban Conflagration
Keyword details
Total words: 3,164
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.8% Special Pleading: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst