Keyword summary
44%1 analyzed article/video83 analyzed words
BS Summary: These UN US France Human Rights results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 247 faulty-reasoning hits from 332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.6% and a BS Rank of 97% (1,743 of 50,130 keywords). This UN US France Human Rights is worse (more manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group.
UN US France Human Rights
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
UN US France Human Rights attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
UN US France Human Rights vs sitewide
UN US France Human Rights attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.