US walks out on France at UN meeting to protest ally's criticism of America's human rights record 25%
By Edith M. Lederer12% AP58%
7/27/2026, 12:48:57 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 60.2% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 182 faulty-reasoning hits from 83 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.5% and a BS Rank of 25% (19,149 of 25,265 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the article peer group.
UNITED NATIONS — U.S. diplomats walked out as their French counterparts were speaking at the United Nations on Monday after America’s close European ally criticized the Trump administration’s human rights record.
The surprise move during a U.N.
Security Council meeting on Ukraine followed U.S. opposition to giving U.N. human rights chief Volker Türk another four-year term.
The reappointment on Friday got overwhelming support, including from France.
Confirmation Bias
0%Confirmation Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
1.8%PublicationThe Washington Post
3.7%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Anchoring Bias
0%Anchoring Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.2%PublicationThe Washington Post
1.3%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Availability Heuristic
0%Availability Heuristic
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
1.1%PublicationThe Washington Post
4.9%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Representativeness Heuristic
0%Representativeness Heuristic
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.1%PublicationThe Washington Post
1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Hindsight Bias
0%Hindsight Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Overconfidence Bias
0%Overconfidence Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
3.4%PublicationThe Washington Post
1.3%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Framing Effect
37.3%Framing Effect
OverallThis article
37.3%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
2.7%PublicationThe Washington Post
21.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Loss Aversion
0%Loss Aversion
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.1%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.8%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Status Quo Bias
0%Status Quo Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.1%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.9%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Sunk Cost Effect
0%Sunk Cost Effect
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Optimism Bias
0%Optimism Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.6%PublicationThe Washington Post
3.6%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Pessimism Bias
0%Pessimism Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.5%PublicationThe Washington Post
3.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Negativity Bias
37.3%Negativity Bias
OverallThis article
37.3%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
2.7%PublicationThe Washington Post
18.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Self-Serving Bias
0%Self-Serving Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
1.4%PublicationThe Washington Post
1.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%Fundamental Attribution Error
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.6%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.9%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Actor-Observer Bias
0%Actor-Observer Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.4%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
In-Group Bias
0%In-Group Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
1.2%PublicationThe Washington Post
2.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.5%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.8%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Halo Effect
12%Halo Effect
OverallThis article
12%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.7%PublicationThe Washington Post
2.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Horn Effect
0%Horn Effect
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.4%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%Dunning-Kruger Effect
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Recency Bias
0%Recency Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
2.4%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Primacy Effect
22.9%Primacy Effect
OverallThis article
22.9%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.3%PublicationThe Washington Post
1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Blind-Spot Bias
0%Blind-Spot Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Ad Hominem
0%Ad Hominem
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
3.6%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.8%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Straw Man
0%Straw Man
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.2%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Appeal to Authority
12%Appeal to Authority
OverallThis article
12%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
1.3%PublicationThe Washington Post
5.2%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
False Dilemma
0%False Dilemma
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.3%PublicationThe Washington Post
1.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Slippery Slope
0%Slippery Slope
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.2%PublicationThe Washington Post
1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Circular Reasoning
0%Circular Reasoning
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Hasty Generalization
0%Hasty Generalization
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
1.1%PublicationThe Washington Post
5.8%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Red Herring
0%Red Herring
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.3%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Bandwagon
0%Bandwagon
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Appeal to Emotion
0%Appeal to Emotion
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
1.8%PublicationThe Washington Post
6.3%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Begging the Question
0%Begging the Question
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.1%PublicationThe Washington Post
1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Post Hoc (False Cause)
60.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)
OverallThis article
60.2%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.3%PublicationThe Washington Post
4.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Tu Quoque
0%Tu Quoque
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.5%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.2%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Burden of Proof
0%Burden of Proof
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.2%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.6%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Appeal to Nature
0%Appeal to Nature
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.1%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Composition/Division
0%Composition/Division
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Anecdotal
0%Anecdotal
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.4%PublicationThe Washington Post
1.9%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
No True Scotsman
0%No True Scotsman
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.2%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
2.8%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%Gambler’s Fallacy
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Middle Ground
0%Middle Ground
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Personal Incredulity
0%Personal Incredulity
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.2%PublicationThe Washington Post
0%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Special Pleading
0%Special Pleading
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Genetic Fallacy
0%Genetic Fallacy
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
0.2%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Unattributed Quote
0%Unattributed Quote
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.3%PublicationThe Washington Post
4.7%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Quote-first Misdirection
0%Quote-first Misdirection
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.6%PublicationThe Washington Post
2.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Biased Writer Voice
37.3%Biased Writer Voice
OverallThis article
37.3%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
1.2%PublicationThe Washington Post
15.1%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Indoctrination
0%Indoctrination
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0.3%PublicationThe Washington Post
2%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%Politically Left Leaning Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
3.6%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%Politically Right Leaning Bias
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
1.3%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
OverallThis article
0%AuthorEdith M. Lederer
0%PublicationThe Washington Post
1.5%Bar shows this article. Yellow and cyan markers show the selected author and publication averages.
83 words analyzed.
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.