Keyword summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tetrachloroethylene results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 261 hits. Analysis detected 1,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (31,217 of 59,653 keywords). This Tetrachloroethylene is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Tetrachloroethylene
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠48%Tetrachloroethylene (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,608
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510047.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos