Keyword summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video2,122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Staten Island Composting Facility results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 404 hits. Analysis detected 2,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (49,457 of 51,808 keywords). This Staten Island Composting Facility is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group.
Staten Island Composting Facility
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 8,488
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751004.5% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos