Keyword summary
12%1 analyzed article/video1,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stanford Fowler results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 296 hits. Analysis detected 1,626 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 21% (40,814 of 51,132 keywords). This Stanford Fowler is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Stanford Fowler
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Stanford Fowler attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Stanford Fowler vs sitewide
Stanford Fowler attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.