Author summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video715 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naomi Weiss results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 1,237 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,860 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (4,713 of 6,740 authors). This Naomi Weiss is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Naomi Weiss
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠31%Naomi Weiss (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,860
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Naomi Weiss attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Naomi Weiss vs sitewide
Naomi Weiss attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos