Keyword summary
26%1 analyzed article/video1,107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These South Carolina Senate Race results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 194 hits. Analysis detected 1,623 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 17% (41,519 of 50,000 keywords). This South Carolina Senate Race is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
South Carolina Senate Race
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
South Carolina Senate Race attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
South Carolina Senate Race vs sitewide
South Carolina Senate Race attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.