Author summary
19% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Baker Maultsby results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 321 hits . Analysis detected 2,999 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,760 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (8,126 of 8,706 authors). This Baker Maultsby is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group. Baker Maultsby
Author details
Total words: 8,760
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.7% percentile 1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst