Keyword summary
54%1 analyzed article/video323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Source Memphis Commercial Appeal results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 594 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 60% (20,180 of 50,207 keywords). This Source Memphis Commercial Appeal is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Source Memphis Commercial Appeal
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Source Memphis Commercial Appeal attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Source Memphis Commercial Appeal vs sitewide
Source Memphis Commercial Appeal attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.