Keyword summary
54%1 analyzed article/video323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Source Memphis Commercial Appeal results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 594 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 60% (20,180 of 50,207 keywords). This Source Memphis Commercial Appeal is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Source Memphis Commercial Appeal
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,292
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Source Memphis Commercial Appeal attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Source Memphis Commercial Appeal vs sitewide
Source Memphis Commercial Appeal attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos