Keyword summary
13% 1 analyzed article/video 740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rvs results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 141 hits . Analysis detected 889 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 14% (50,421 of 58,601 keywords). This Rvs is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. Rvs
Keyword details
Total words: 2,960
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst