Keyword summary
38%1 analyzed article/video2,724 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ruth Bader Ginsburg results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 642 hits. Analysis detected 5,960 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,896 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 22% (45,599 of 57,887 keywords). This Ruth Bader Ginsburg is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
22%Ruth Bader Ginsburg (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,896
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510021.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos