Keyword summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video528 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russia Sanctions Bill results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 1,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (13,762 of 25,392 keywords). This Russia Sanctions Bill is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the peer group.
Russia Sanctions Bill
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%Nationalism1%
⁠0%West Olympic Boulevard1%
⁠46%Russia Sanctions Bill (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,112
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Russia Sanctions Bill attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Russia Sanctions Bill vs All Other Publications
Russia Sanctions Bill attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos