Keyword summary
6%1 analyzed article/video933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rumi results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 747 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (55,991 of 56,387 keywords). This Rumi is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
Rumi
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
1%Rumi (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,732
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751000.7% percentile
0.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.0%0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos