Author summary
5% 1 analyzed article/video 933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Pence results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 130 hits . Analysis detected 747 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (9,000 of 9,089 authors). This Steven Pence is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group. Steven Pence
Author details
Total words: 3,732
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.0% percentile 0.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.0% 0.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst