Keyword summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robotic Wingmen results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 85 hits. Analysis detected 315 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,540 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (45,256 of 51,714 keywords). This Robotic Wingmen is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
Robotic Wingmen
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠13%Robotic Wingmen (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,540
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510012.5% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos