Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Richmond Community Investment Initiative results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, False Dilemma, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 457 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 52,131 keywords). This Richmond Community Investment Initiative is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Richmond Community Investment Initiative
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,800
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos