Keyword summary
57%1 analyzed article/video1,047 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Quoc Le results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 598 hits. Analysis detected 2,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 51% (29,655 of 59,653 keywords). This Quoc Le is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Quoc Le
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
51%Quoc Le (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,188
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos