Keyword summary
28%1 analyzed article/video777 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Procter & Gamble Co results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Recency Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 284 hits. Analysis detected 1,141 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 33% (33,965 of 50,197 keywords). This Procter & Gamble Co is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Procter & Gamble Co
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Procter & Gamble Co attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Procter & Gamble Co vs sitewide
Procter & Gamble Co attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.