Keyword summary
14%1 analyzed article/video6,710 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Wolaver results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 1,773 hits. Analysis detected 9,970 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (51,882 of 52,788 keywords). This Paul Wolaver is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
Paul Wolaver
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
2%Paul Wolaver (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 26,840
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751001.7% percentile
0.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles26.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos