Keyword summary
44% 1 analyzed article/video 674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nonprofit Colleges results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 218 hits . Analysis detected 643 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,022 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 74% (15,589 of 59,653 keywords). This Nonprofit Colleges is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group. Nonprofit Colleges
Keyword details
Total words: 2,022
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.9% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst