Keyword summary
16% 2 analyzed articles/videos 795 analyzed words
BS Summary: These No Parking Zone results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Halo Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 250 hits . Analysis detected 1,111 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,800 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 9% (48,853 of 53,325 keywords). This No Parking Zone is better (less manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group. No Parking Zone
Keyword details
Total words: 4,800
Article count: 2
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.4% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CBC 71% 8/4/2026, 1:43:17 PM
CBC 71% 8/3/2026, 8:35:58 PM