Keyword summary
3% 1 analyzed article/video 1,627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Memphis & Pearl Project results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 1% saturation with 67 hits . Analysis detected 701 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (52,913 of 53,020 keywords). This Memphis & Pearl Project is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. Memphis & Pearl Project
Keyword details
Total words: 6,508
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.2% percentile 0.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.5% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.3% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst