Keyword summary
55% 1 analyzed article/video 2,137 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Strom results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 991 hits . Analysis detected 5,339 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 29% (37,968 of 53,020 keywords). This Mark Strom is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Mark Strom
Keyword details
Total words: 8,548
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst