Keyword summary
50%1 analyzed article/video472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Failings results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 1,187 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 59% (24,444 of 59,653 keywords). This Legal Failings is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Legal Failings
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
59%Legal Failings (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,888
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510059.0% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.8%14.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos