Author summary
ā 37%1 analyzed article/video3,536 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Mellins results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 2,256 hits. Analysis detected 7,096 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ā 10% (6,115 of 6,752 authors). This Sam Mellins is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
Sam Mellins
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Sam Mellins attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Sam Mellins vs sitewide
Sam Mellins attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.