Keyword summary
27%1 analyzed article/video691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Bakst results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 915 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,073 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (13,639 of 34,800 keywords). This Laura Bakst is worse (more manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Laura Bakst
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Laura Bakst attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Laura Bakst vs sitewide
Laura Bakst attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.