Author summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video795 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Santana results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 374 hits. Analysis detected 3,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (2,084 of 5,088 authors). This Rebecca Santana is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Rebecca Santana
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠60%Rebecca Santana (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,180
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Rebecca Santana attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Rebecca Santana vs sitewide
Rebecca Santana attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos