Keyword summary
93%1 analyzed article/video767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kids Online Safety Act results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 1,072 hits. Analysis detected 5,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 84% (9,640 of 59,653 keywords). This Kids Online Safety Act is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Kids Online Safety Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
84%Kids Online Safety Act (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,068
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510083.8% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 34.9%34.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 14.5%14.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.6%12.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.7%12.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 34.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos