Author summary
91%1 analyzed article/video767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David B. McGarry results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 1,072 hits. Analysis detected 5,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 86% (1,336 of 9,471 authors). This David B. McGarry is worse (more manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group.
David B. McGarry
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
86%David B. McGarry (selected)5%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,068
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

86% percentile
025507510085.9% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 34.9%34.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.9%7.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 14.5%14.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.6%12.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 12.7%12.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.9%5.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 34.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos