Keyword summary
â 25%1 analyzed article/video969 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justine Siegal results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 324 hits. Analysis detected 1,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of â 34% (33,982 of 51,302 keywords). This Justine Siegal is better (less manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Justine Siegal
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Justine Siegal attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Justine Siegal vs sitewide
Justine Siegal attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.