Keyword summary
â 92% 1 analyzed article/video 275 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julie Macklowe results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 211 hits . Analysis detected 1,154 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of â 87% (6,756 of 51,675 keywords). This Julie Macklowe is worse (more manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group. Julie Macklowe
Keyword details
Total words: 1,100
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.9% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product⌠Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.2% 19.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst