New York’s Last Socialite Isn’t Going Down Without a Fight 75%

By Suzy Weiss66%

7/31/2026, 1:24:03 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Primacy Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.6% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 586 faulty-reasoning hits from 275 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.8% and a BS Rank of 75% (6,585 of 25,563 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the article peer group.

Welcome to Two Drinks , the column where The Free Press catches up with a newsmaker, trendsetter, or power broker. 
This week, Suzy Weiss sits down with Julie Macklowe, the thrice-Trump-voting socialite who shocked the New York elite by supporting Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax—then found out this week that she was erroneously expected to pay it. 
“Maybe the mayor should spend less time on TikTok and more time figuring out how to run a portal,” she says. 
Julie Macklowe, in her Gucci tank top, Louis Vuitton sneakers and load-bearing Hemmerle diamond earrings, has some bones to pick. 
We’re at Jean-Georges Vongerichten’s Four Twenty Five restaurant in Manhattan, and we’re drinking—what else?—cocktails made from Macklowe’s own line of single malt whiskey, the “first luxury, and only luxury, American single malt,” she tells me. 
The blond mom of two and New York society fixture is having a lemonade and a few fingers of Macklowe Gold, which retails for nearly $300 a bottle; I’m sipping a Manhattan, made with her rye . 
Not long ago, Macklowe—a loyal Donald J. 
Trump voter—made headlines by coming out in favor of New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s pied-à-terre tax, an annual levy on second homes worth over $5 million that took effect July 1. 
“You have people popping in from Palm Beach and throwing galas,” she says. 
“They don’t even pay New York taxes, and they’re chairing it.” 
Macklowe tells me she’s gotten “dirty looks at parties in the Hamptons” and a few people being “asshole-y,” but says her approach is: “Deal with it. 
And if you can’t, I don’t care.” 
Confirmation Bias
4%
Anchoring Bias
13.5%
Availability Heuristic
13.5%
Representativeness Heuristic
11.3%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
12.7%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
2.5%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
31.6%
Self-Serving Bias
9.5%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
7.3%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
2.5%
Primacy Effect
24.7%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
0%
False Dilemma
2.5%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
4.7%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
0%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
8.7%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
7.6%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
30.2%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
26.2%

275 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.