Keyword summary
23% 1 analyzed article/video 992 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julian Jonker results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 193 hits . Analysis detected 1,500 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (37,625 of 53,074 keywords). This Julian Jonker is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. Julian Jonker
Keyword details
Total words: 3,968
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst