Keyword summary
â 19% 1 analyzed article/video 660 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jihadi Captivity results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 129 hits . Analysis detected 466 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of â 57% (26,134 of 59,653 keywords). This Jihadi Captivity is worse (more manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group. Jihadi Captivity
Keyword details
Total words: 1,980
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.2% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst