Keyword summary
36%1 analyzed article/video691 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Institute For Tourism And Recreation Research results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 1,328 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,764 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 59% (20,832 of 50,722 keywords). This Institute For Tourism And Recreation Research is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Institute For Tourism And Recreation Research
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Institute For Tourism And Recreation Research attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Institute For Tourism And Recreation Research vs sitewide
Institute For Tourism And Recreation Research attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.