Keyword summary
27%1 analyzed article/video925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These How To Train Your Dragon results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 2,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (19,017 of 26,937 keywords). This How To Train Your Dragon is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
How To Train Your Dragon
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
How To Train Your Dragon attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
How To Train Your Dragon vs sitewide
How To Train Your Dragon attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.