Author summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Deal results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 2,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (3,098 of 4,797 authors). This David Deal is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
David Deal
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠0%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠1%Jason Karaian1%
⁠36%David Deal (selected)3%
⁠100%Daniel Arkin38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,700
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
David Deal attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
David Deal vs All Other Publications
David Deal attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos