Keyword summary
22% 1 analyzed article/video 944 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grant Money results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 259 hits . Analysis detected 1,208 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 22% (41,862 of 53,074 keywords). This Grant Money is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Grant Money
Keyword details
Total words: 3,776
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst