Keyword summary
5%1 analyzed article/video1,115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grand Teton National Park results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 338 hits. Analysis detected 1,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (36,932 of 38,245 keywords). This Grand Teton National Park is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group.
Grand Teton National Park
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Grand Teton National Park attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Grand Teton National Park vs sitewide
Grand Teton National Park attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.