Author summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video1,115 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark DeGraff results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 338 hits. Analysis detected 1,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (6,417 of 6,778 authors). This Mark DeGraff is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Mark DeGraff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠1%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠6%Mark DeGraff (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,460
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Mark DeGraff attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Mark DeGraff vs sitewide
Mark DeGraff attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos