Keyword summary
85%1 analyzed article/video605 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gold Leaf results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 619 hits. Analysis detected 2,955 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 83% (10,488 of 59,653 keywords). This Gold Leaf is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Gold Leaf
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
83%Gold Leaf (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,420
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510082.4% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 25.6%25.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 17.3%17.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos