Author summary
74% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,313 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gail O'Hara results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 1,064 hits . Analysis detected 7,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,345 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 53% (4,362 of 9,213 authors). This Gail O'Hara is worse (more manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group. Gail O'Hara
Author details
Total words: 8,345
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.4% 12.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.8%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst