Keyword summary
4%1 analyzed article/video725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fisheries Science results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 3.5% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 727 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (35,943 of 38,319 keywords). This Fisheries Science is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group.
Fisheries Science
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Fisheries Science attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Fisheries Science vs sitewide
Fisheries Science attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.