Keyword summary
44%2 analyzed articles/videos2,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These F 16 Fighting Falcon results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 686 hits. Analysis detected 4,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,068 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (47,378 of 57,912 keywords). This F 16 Fighting Falcon is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
F 16 Fighting Falcon
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
19%F 16 Fighting Falcon (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,068
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

18% percentile
025507510018.2% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos