Keyword summary
44% 1 analyzed article/video 1,009 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ea Sports College Football results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 385 hits . Analysis detected 2,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,036 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 36% (33,406 of 51,534 keywords). This Ea Sports College Football is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Ea Sports College Football
Keyword details
Total words: 4,036
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst