Keyword summary
59% 2 analyzed articles/videos 399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Jonsson results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 916 hits . Analysis detected 4,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,636 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (20,360 of 53,046 keywords). This David Jonsson is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. David Jonsson
Keyword details
Total words: 4,636
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.8% 19.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst