Keyword summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conocophillips results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 302 hits . Analysis detected 1,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,052 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 63% (22,174 of 59,653 keywords). This Conocophillips is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group. Conocophillips
Keyword details
Total words: 2,052
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst