Keyword summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video1,116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Concrete results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 505 hits. Analysis detected 3,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (19,285 of 57,474 keywords). This Concrete is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Concrete
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠67%Concrete (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos