Author summary
70%2 analyzed articles/videos2,093 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex Ross results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 614 hits. Analysis detected 6,374 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,372 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 55% (4,164 of 9,195 authors). This Alex Ross is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Alex Ross
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
55%Alex Ross (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,372
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510054.7% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos